
- Autofocus only in 60I. Manual only in 30P / 24P
- Bad on-camera microphone, it was expected.
- No info from panasonic on the 24P operation, read your FCP/Adobe manuals well 2 understand how it works.
Make sure 2 only use the 63min PQ panasonic tapes!!!
Of course you will have 2 buy a good microphone like the K6/M64/M66 or AT897.
I suggest you 2 get rain/dust slicker if you're going 2 shoot in the countryside/desert... you don't want dust/rain 2 get inside.
You also going 2 have 2 buy a DV deck or a cheap DV camera 4 playback not 2 wear the video heads....
Just be creative now.
However 35mm still rules... but the future 4 digital looks good.
Also the problems with this camera have been corrected in the AG-DVX100a version so you may want 2 hold back until you see that one on-line here. You would also do well 2 get the AG-LA7200G anamorphic lens so that you can shoot in scope with a squeezed digital image (Just like a real anamorphic lens!)!
Bottom line. This is a top of the range domestic camcorder with pro qualities. 16mm motion picture camera users should use this in their productions instead. It is a waaaaay cheaper & looks better. The cine-switch technology in this camera is based on the same system that Lucas used 2 film his New Star Wars movies with. Also the PAL version does not have 24 fps but this does not matter because PAL is 25 fps & the difference can not be noticed with the naked eye alone & transfer 2 film is easy with 25 fps PAL but not so easy with 30 fps NTSC so the NTSC version of this camera can also shoot 24 fps 4 that. Also this camera is loaded with functions. There is not a single thing you can do not with it but! & this is a big but! the NEW AG-DVX100a will address the negatives that the AG-DVX100 has (zoom problems & focus problems & other things). Keep an eye out 4 the AG-DVX100a although it may be $1000 more expensive than this one but should be no concern 2 those who had 2 shoot on expensive 16mm film equipment with expensive 16mm film stock & expensive 16mm processing & expensive 16mm 2 video transfers.
16mm is dead.
In terms of picture quality, the thing that really sets it apart from other DV cameras is the 24 fps progressive scan aspect. This means that your video frames wind up looking like photographs or cinema frames because there is no interlaced "comb" pattern on moving objects. The 24p format alone is enough reason 2 choose this camera over others, I think. The last documentary I shot was with a Sony DSR-500 camera, which cost about $13,000. I think the DVX-100 images hold up well by comparison. The Sony, though recording interlaced images, had better image processing 2 extend the dynamic range, which I miss, but I guess that's what the extra $10,000 buys you...
That & the ability 2 shoot anamorphic images, which the Panasonic DVX-100 will only do with an add-on anamorphic converter that, I think, costs about $700 & might prevent you from super-close focusing. Without the converter, the lens on the DVX-100 can focus right up 2 the glass when it's zoomed wide. However, the smallest area you can focus on is about 4-5 inches across, which makes it a little difficult 2 do super close-up work. Not a big draw-back.
Now, after about 160 hours of fairly intense recording in the dust & heat of Iraq, the camera has developed a problem with the flip-out LCD display. Everything else continues 2 work fine, & I can still film using the eye-piece viewfinder (not as sharp as the LCD). I will probably buy a new DVX-100 & use the one I have now as back-up.
If you want 2 edit 24p material from this camera, the best (and as far as I'm concerned, only) option is Final Cut Pro 4 on a Macintosh computer. This is working well 4 me in the field using a 17" Apple G4 Powerbook & 500GB Lacie external Firewire800 hard drives, which you can "daisy-chain" together. No hardware / software problems at all so far.
A couple things wrong with the camera design: The sound level dials are positioned on the bottom edge of the camera where they have a tendency 2 get turned by accident. Solution: tape them down with a piece of gaffer tape on the lower half of the dials that you can peel back 2 adjust levels. Otherwise, audio recording with this camera is great -- the same quality as the Sony DSR-500 camera when using an external XLR mic, though lacking an "auto levels" setting. Other things on the wish list would be some kind of sun-shade 4 the flip-out LCD -- it is really hard 2 see the images in bright sunlight, & correct exposure is diffcult 2 judge.
In the future, I hope that there will be a HDV version of this camera that records 24p HD with better dynamic range + an integrated upgrade 2 Final Cut Pro 4 editing HDV firewire output. Also, I would like 2 see this same camera made with a slightly more durable design -- even if it cost a bit more. It's absolutely a great buy & a great camera, but 4 extreme conditions encountered in many film shoots it would be nice 2 have a truly professional, less plastic model (with a sharper eye-piece viewfinder).
But almost no serious complaints -- an amazing camera.
That said, I should mention that Panasonic has just come out with a newer model of this camera, the DVX-100A, that addresses some of my concerns listed here. Costs about $4,000.
Most of the newer Editing software is now capable 2 handle DVX100 24p format.
This cam was released in December 2003. As of December 2004, in my opinion, it is still the best Professional camcorder in the price range of 5000.
You've heard it all from the other reviews.
The cons:
- No autofocus in 24P... & that really sucks.
- No remote control 4 focusing either!!!
- Microphones do not sound good.. but that was expected. So get external microphone
- Don't expect 2 shoot during lowlight environment in 24P... it's just not made 4 it.
- Expect 2 buy a lot more stuff after this.
- The manual is really BAD. If you don't know how 2 use this camera, you have hours/days before understanding it all.